Comments on Blogposts

Leon Liang:
I think that this is a really good blog post because of how organized it is. But maybe you can go into more depth about the plot twists that you mention earlier.
"Another thing that Brisingr was better than the first two books was that it’s plot was more complete than the Eragon and Eldest. Unlike the first two books, this book had double the length compare to Eldest nearly triple compared to Eragon." Also, you don't talk about a lot of the points you mention. You touch on a lot of subjects. but never really talk much about them. 


Kaila:
I think that this blog post is good because of how concise you put your points. Maybe put some more ideas in your body paragraphs rather than just in your introductions. I especially liked this part of your essay: " Its random and weak. basically this book has weaknesses because the author was writing it to sund like an autistic kid, and he did a good job, except most people do not think like autistic people, so there are going to be weaknesses regardless. His style of writing is a weaknesses in itself depending on what your taste in writing is."
It showed that you really did look into how the writer's style is built up within the book.


Phuong:
This is a good book review. Sometimes you look too much into one specific thing and don't cover many of the other ideas you bring up. When you talk about the chapters being an issue, you kind of become repetitive in your response to it's format. You should also put some transitions between your ideas and your points because it seems really abrupt when you switch off ideas. The book seems really interesting! I want to read it now too. Overall this is a good book review though :D